Bin Discord

Discord Bin

The World Court in The Hague ruled on the conflict generated between two sister nations, for installation on the banks of the River Uruguay, a processing plant pulp, with Finnish capital.

The opinion in question, balance the dispute, in a Solomonic decision, which criticizes the state for having violated the Uruguay treaty signed by both countries, but allowing in turn, than the usual pulp mill continues to operate, freeing the Uruguayan state payment of any repairs to his Argentine counterpart.

In plain language condemning rape, but it can turn the creature engendered by such a procedure violation, continue to operate, provided, of course, do not pollute the environment threatened by the polluting activity.

Without doubt, the International Court in The Hague, must have a line of thought, in line with the anti-abortion preaching church authorities, by not allowing Gualeguaychú picketers are away with it, attempting to remove the eyesore challenging , standing proud in front of their eyes.

Much has been said about the right of the Uruguay, the forest industry has developed, how much about 20% of productive land are for this activity, yet very little is said, that the plantations have been made responding to very specific interests, and that many of these plantations have displaced agricultural production sectors that would thrive well in these areas.

Now, we have timber, and of course now we have something to do with it.

I understand that the forest industry can be an interesting development center and foreign exchange earnings, but I doubt that the net revenue that the country received in this context, can exceed that obtained through the agricultural and livestock production.

We are told that the mill erected along the Uruguay River, the river that our Indians called "river of birds" does not pollute, and as such we are told that in Finland, are pulp mills of similar size that are installed on the banks of its rivers and the population not at risk of contamination, of course, in Finland, for its climate, there is no agricultural activity and in our country, its mountains are suitable for afforestation, the need for each other is very different, is not the same to live in Uruguay to endure adverse weather Finns.

The truth compatriots, is that certain rulers stoked, we have imposed afforestation and subsequent consequences, and that fueled other rulers, who in addition to "living" have been "fun" in one of their mischievous attitudes , violated treaties signed, and that the result of that violation, is this pulp mill of discord, which according to the final verdict of the International Court honorable, can not be aborted.





At present the cause of this pulp mill, is a national cause that has united across the political spectrum in our country around him, is now a national cause, we turn to the well-known "claw charrúa" to stand in front of our neighbors, and defense our great little ground space, and tell the world: Come visit us, "Uruguay is a country Natural" natural?

The truth is that we have introduced a boil coastal ugly the face of our "river of birds" that remains now is to try to prevent it boil, does not spread through the rest of our natural face, no doubt carefully and dedication can achieve, but it is a boil, no doubt it is.

Hugo W. Arostegui